Cardiology Research, ISSN 1923-2829 print, 1923-2837 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, Cardiol Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://cr.elmerpub.com

Review

Volume 16, Number 1, February 2025, pages 1-14


Beyond the Beat: A Multifaceted Review of Atrial Fibrillation in Sepsis: Risk Factors, Management Strategies, and Economic Impact

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Proposed pathophysiology mechanisms of NOAF in sepsis. NOAF: new-onset atrial fibrillation.
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Various managements for NOAF in sepsis. NOAF: new-onset atrial fibrillation.

Table

Table 1. Study Characteristics, Risk Factors, and Outcomes for NOAF in Critical Illness
 
Author, year of studyStudy designNumber of patientsNOAF, n (%)Risk factor for NOAFOutcomes
NOAF: new-onset atrial fibrillation; AF: atrial fibrillation; HTN: hypertension; CHF: congestive heart failure; CAD: coronary artery disease; MI: myocardial infarction; DM: diabetes mellitus; SAPS: simplified acute physiology score; PAD: peripheral artery disease; HLD: hyperlipidemia; MODS: multiple organ dysfunction score; CKD: chronic kidney disease; SIRS: systemic inflammatory response syndrome; LVEF: left ventricle ejection fraction; APACHE: acute physiology and chronic health evaluation; MAP: mean arterial pressure; SOFA: sequential organ failure assessment; ICU: intensive care unit; SR: sinus rhythm; RR: relative risk; OR: odds ratio; HR: hazard ratio; HLD: hyperlipidemia; PAD: peripheral arterial disease; MICU: medical intensive care unit; BP: blood pressure.
Liu et al, 2024 [13]Retrospective1,425,055 patients with sepsis21,327 (1.49% (95% CI: 1.47 - 1.51))Older age, male sex, HTN, CHF, CAD, valvular disease, mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, pericarditis, myocarditis, MI, ischemic stroke, septic shock, cerebrovascular diseaseIn-hospital mortality: adjusted RR = 1.03 (95% CI: 1.01 - 1.06)
Paula et al, 2024 [14]Retrospective1,357 noncardiac ICU patients73 (5.38)Older age, HTN, DM, renal failure, CHF, SAPS IIHospital mortality of chronic vs. NOAF: 31% vs. 28.8%, P = 0.779; hospital mortality AF vs. non-AF: 30.2% vs. 22.9%, P = 0.024
Wetterslev et al, 2023 [27]Prospective1,415 ICU patients13.3% (11.5 - 15.1)HTN, paroxysmal AF, sepsis, or high disease severity at ICU admissionAdjusted cause-specific HR for 90-day mortality by AF was 1.38 (95% CI: 0.95 - 1.99)
Savaie et al, 2023 [29]Retrospective340 noncardiac ICU patients44 (12.9)Pneumonia, thyroid diseaseThe mortality rate of patients with NOAF was 21%. OR of the presence of NOAF and mortality (P < 0.05; OR: 2.378, CI: 1.104 - 5.16)
Wang et al, 2023 [15]Retrospective21,538 sepsis patients78 (0.53), 6,759 total AF patients (31.4)Older age, MI, CHF, HTN, HLD, PAD, cerebrovascular disease, dementia, chronic pulmonary disease, renal disease, diabetes28-day mortality (HR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.99 - 1.15)
Fernando et al, 2020 [16]Retrospective15,014 ICU patients, 1,944 sepsis patients1,541 (10.3), 208 sepsis patients (10.7)Older age, higher MODS, higher comorbidities burden (CHF, PAD, HTN, COPD, DM, CKD, liver disease, malignancy, psychosis, depression)In-hospital mortality for sepsis patients: adjusted OR = 1.28 (95% CI: 1.09 - 1.36))
Steinberg et al, 2019 [28]Prospective27 septic shock patients9 (33.3)High SOFA scoreOverall mortality AF vs. SR: 66.7% vs. 11.1%, P = 0.024
Desai et al, 2019 [17]Retrospective5,808,166 sepsis patients1,126,433 (19.4)Older age, White race, male sex, cardiovascular disease, pulmonary disease, diabetes, hypothyroidism, cerebrovascular disease, renal failure, fluid and electrolyte disordersAll-cause mortality rate for AF vs. non-AF with sepsis: 18.4% and 11.9%, P = 0.001
Makrygiannis et al, 2018 [18]Prospective133 noncardiac ICU patients20 (15)Age > 65, arterial HTN, SIRS, sepsis, left atrial dilatation, diastolic dysfunctionNOAF is not an independent predictor of ICU mortality. Sepsis and age > 65 years were statistically significant an independent predictor of ICU mortality.
Launey et al, 2019 [30]Prospective261 patients with septic shock57 (22)Lower risk with low dose hydrocortisoneICU mortality in hydrocortisone group vs. non-hydrocortisone group: 37% vs. 24% (P = 0.018). 28-day mortality in hydrocortisone group vs. non-hydrocortisone group: 38% vs. 26% (P = 0.036)
Moss et al, 2017 [19]Retrospective8,356 ICU patients749 (8.96)Older age, acute respiratory failure, sepsisHospital mortality: OR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.01 - 2.63
Liu et al, 2016 [31]Retrospective503 sepsis patients240 (47.7)Older age, LVEF < 45%, HTN, CHF, CAD, cerebrovascular diseaseFailure of restored SR was independently associated with increased in-hospital mortality in patients with sepsis and NOAF.
Guenancia et al, 2015 [20]Prospective66 patients with septic shock29 (43.9)Older age, LVEF < 45%ICU mortality rate in septic shock patients with and without new-onset AF was 24% vs. 19%, P = 0.61. Mortality did not differ between these two groups at 28 days (22% vs. 28%, NOAF vs. SR respectively, P = 0.58) and at 90 days (41% vs. 43% respectively, P = 0.88).
Shaver et al, 2015 [10]Prospective1,770 ICU patients123 (7), 13% of sepsis patients, 10% of patients without sepsisOlder age, shock, hypotension, advanced organ failure, positive fluid balance, antecedent vasopressor use, increased left atrial dimension, more diastolic dysfunction, mitral regurgitationOR for death in sepsis patients with any AF: 1.29 (0.85 - 1.94), P = 0.228
Wells et al, 2011 [21]Retrospective465 MICU patients with sepsis/septic shock132Older age, CAD, White raceSepsis + NOAF is 5.7 times more likely to die compared to the Neither group.
Chen et al, 2015 [22]Retrospective741 MICU patients53 (7.15)Older age, APACHE II score, systolic BP, MAP, heart rateIn-hospital mortality: adjusted OR = 2.21, 95% CI: 1.07 - 4.54, P = 0.032
Walkey et al, 2014 [23]Retrospective138,722 sepsis patients9,540 (6.9)Older age, male sex, White race, comorbid conditions (chronic lung disease, heart failure, ischemic heart disease, valvular heart disease), acute organ failureGreater 5-year risks of hospitalization for heart failure compared NOAF vs. control group (11.2% vs 8.2%). Multivariable-adjusted HR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.16 - 1.34. Ischemic stroke (5.3% vs. 4.7%; HR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.10 - 1.36). Death (74.8% vs. 72.1%; HR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01 - 1.07).
Walkey et al, 2013 [24]Retrospective60,209 sepsis patients4,320 (7.2)Older age, White race, acute organ dysfunction, ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, right heart catheterization, diagnosis of endocarditis, and coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
Walkey et al, 2011 [25]Retrospective49,082 sepsis patients2,896 (5.9)Older age, obesity, CHF, metastatic/hematologic malignancy, prior stroke, organ dysfunction, respiratory, abdominal, skin or soft tissue infection, bacteremiaIn-hospital mortality: RR = 1.13 (95% CI: 1.08 - 1.19)
Meierhenrich et al, 2010 [26]Prospective629 noncardiac ICU patients → 64 septic shock patients49 in ICU patients → 23 in septic shock patientsOlder age, arterial HTN, higher SOFAICU mortality in septic shock patients with new-onset AF was 10/23 (44%) compared with patient that had SR: 6/27 (22%) (P = 0.14). The median length of ICU stay among surviving patients was longer in patients with new-onset AF compared to those with maintained SR (30 vs. 17 days, P = 0.017). Failure to restore SR was associated with increased ICU mortality (71.4% vs. 21.4%, P = 0.015).