Cardiology Research, ISSN 1923-2829 print, 1923-2837 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, Cardiol Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://cr.elmerpub.com

Original Article

Volume 15, Number 6, December 2024, pages 425-438


Does Chronic Kidney Disease Influence Revascularization Strategy After Acute Coronary Syndrome? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Flowchart of study selection.
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Forest plot summarizing effect estimates for the receipt of CABG by people revascularized after ACS with versus without CKD. In real-world practice, people with CKD are more likely to receive CABG (versus PCI) if revascularized following ACS, than those without kidney disease. ACS: acute coronary syndrome; CKD: chronic kidney disease; CABG: coronary artery bypass graft; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Forest plot summarizing effect estimates for the receipt of CABG, versus PCI, amongst people revascularized after ACS with versus without CKD, by ACS type. Amongst those revascularized for ACS, people with CKD are more likely to receive CABG (versus PCI) than those without kidney disease, independent of ACS type. However, this association is stronger following STEMI, than NSTE-ACS. ACS: acute coronary syndrome; CABG: coronary artery bypass graft; CKD: chronic kidney disease; NSTE-ACS: non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome; OR: odds ratio; STEMI; ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Figure 4.
Figure 4. Flowchart demonstrating the crude proportions of individuals receiving invasive management by ACS type and CKD status. People with CKD are less likely to receive either invasive coronary angiography or revascularization (of any form) following ACS, than those without kidney disease. In this figure, invasive coronary angiography and revascularization are portrayed as distinct steps, however in clinical practice, angiography is typically associated with immediate revascularization in STEMI. ACS: acute coronary syndrome; CABG: coronary artery bypass graft; CKD: chronic kidney disease; NSTE-ACS: non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome; PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention; STEMI: ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Tables

Table 1. Characteristics of Included Studies
 
Study design, countryHospital PCI capabilityNDatesDefinition of impaired CKD functionDefinition of control groupACS type(s)Age rangeCrude figuresEffect estimates, OR (95% CI)
PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention; ACS: acute coronary syndrome; CKD: chronic kidney disease; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; ICD: international classification of diseases; NSTE-ACS: non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome; NSTEMI; non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; STEMI: ST-elevation myocardial infarction; UA: unstable angina; PD: peritoneal dialysis; HD: hemodialysis; ESRD: end-stage renal disease; ICD-9 CM: International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification.
Alushi et al, 2021 [29]Prospective, GermanyAll4382012 - 2017eGFR < 30 or dialysis duration > 30days at the time of MIeGFR > 90NSTEMI, UANot specifiedNSTE-ACS 25/222 CKD vs. 18/216 non-CKDCrude OR NSTE-ACS 1.36 (0.75 - 2.46)
Adjusted OR NSTE-ACS 3.20 (1.28 - 8.00)
Bagai et al, 2018 [7]Retrospective, USAAll615,4252007 - 2015eGFR < 60eGFR ≥ 60NSTEMI, STEMINot specifiedAll ACS 21,191/171,140 CKD vs. 49,707/444,285 non-CKDCrude OR all ACS 1.12 (1.10 - 1.14)
NSTE-ACS 16,344/91,021 CKD vs. 37,087/216,244 non-CKDCrude OR NSTE-ACS 1.12 (1.10 - 1.14)
STEMI 4,847/80,119 CKD vs. 37,087/228,041 non-CKDCrude OR STEMI 1.10 (1.06 - 1.14)
Blicher et al, 2013 [28]Retrospective, DenmarkMixed34,7222000 - 2009Code for CKD/dialysis [4]No CKD code [5]NSTEMI, STEMI [2]> 25 yearsAll MI 239/904 CKD vs. 6,337/33,818 non-CKDCrude OR all ACS 1.56 (1.34 - 1.81)
Kawsara et al, 2022 [33]Retrospective, USAMixed69,2812016 - 2019Dialysis codeNo dialysis codeSTEMI≥ 18 yearsSTEMI 37/522 CKD vs. 3,438/68,759 non-CKDCrude OR STEMI 1.45 (1.04 - 2.03)
Khan et al, 2020 [34]Retrospective, USAMixed149,9832012 - 2017ICD-9 CM code for ESRDOtherSTEMI≥ 18 yearsSTEMI 251/1,753 CKD vs. 63,675/12,735/148,230 non-CKDSTEMI OR 1.78 (1.55 - 1.03)
Kotwal et al, 2017 [35]Retrospective, AustraliaMixed12,6622004 - 2008ICD-10 code for CKDNo CKD codeNSTEMI, STEMI≥ 18 yearsAll ACS 272/811 CKD vs. 1,741/11,851 non-CKDAll ACS OR 2.93 (2.51 - 3.42)
Lin et al, 2022 [13]Retrospective, TaiwanMixed67,5342001 - 2013Code for CKD/dialysisNo code for CKD or dialysisNSTEMI, STEMI≥ 20 yearsAll ACS 2,433/16,477 CKD vs. 4,894/51,057 non-CKDAll ACS OR 1.62 (1.55 - 1.72)
Murray et al, 2018 [36]Retrospective, USAMixed236,2842001 - 2012ICD-9 code for CKD1-5 or dialysisNo code for CKD or dialysisNSTEMI≥ 18 yearsNSTE-ACS 7,227/22,891 CKD vs. 47,517/208,293 non-CKDNSTE-ACS OR 1.18 (1.14 - 1.21)
Panchal et al, 2021 [37]Retrospective, USAMixed87,8832012 - 2014ICD-9 code for CKD1 - 5, unspecified CKD, or dialysisNo code for CKD or dialysisSTEMINot specifiedSTEMI 838/7,476 CKD vs. 5,734/80,407 non-CKDSTEMI OR 1.67 (1.55 - 1.81)
Sakhuja et al, 2016 [38]Retrospective, USAMixed141,8382006 - 2010ICD-9 code for ESRD or OPCS codes for PD or HD, without a code for CKDNo ESRD/PD/HD codeSTEMI≥ 20 yearsSTEMI 292/1,248 CKD vs. 13,746/140,590 non-CKDSTEMI OR 1.67 (1.43 - 1.95)
Sanchis et al, 2021 [32]Retrospective, SpainNot specified7,211 (total study size)2002 - 2017eGFR < 60 calculated from admission creatinineAdmission eGFR ≥ 60NSTEMI, UA≥ 70 yearsCrude figures not availableCrude OR NSTE-ACS 0.85 (0.70 - 1.03)
Adjusted OR NSTE-ACS 1.11 (0.92 - 1.35)
Shaw et al, 2014 [6]Retrospective, England & WalesMixed9,7322008 - 2010eGFR < 60 calculated from admission creatinineAdmission eGFR ≥ 60NSTEMI, UANot specifiedNSTE-ACS 274/2,318 CKD vs. 679/7,414 non-CKDCrude OR NSTE-ACS 1.32 (1.15 - 1.54)
Smilowitz et al, 2017 [19]Retrospective, USAMixed388,5922007 - 2012ICD9 codes for CKD3 - 5 or HDNo code for CKD3 - 5 or HDNSTEMI, STEMINot specifiedAll ACS 9,775/43,242 CKD vs. 55,389/345,350 non-CKDCrude OR all ACS 1.53 (1.49 - 1.57)
NSTE-ACS 7,783/30,657 CKD vs. 38,324/175,921 non-CKDAdjusted OR all ACS 1.06 (1.03 - 1.09)
STEMI 1,992/12,585 vs. 17,065/169,429 non-CKDCrude OR NSTE-ACS 1.22 (1.19 - 1.26)
Adjusted OR NSTE-ACS 1.02 (0.99 - 1.06)
Crude OR STEMI 1.69 (1.60 - 1.77)
Adjusted OR STEMI 1.21 (1.14 - 1.28)

 

Table 2. Summary of Findings
 
FindingNo. of studiesNo. of participantsAverage exposure effect (OR (95% CI))Certainty of evidence
ACS: acute coronary syndrome; CABG: coronary artery bypass graft; CKD: chronic kidney disease; NSTE-ACS: non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention; STEMI: ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
CKD is associated with increased odds of receipt of CABG vs. PCI amongst people revascularized following ACS.131,682,2071.50 (1.30 - 1.72)Moderate
CKD is associated with increased odds of receipt of CABG vs. PCI amongst people revascularized following NSTE-ACS.6764,6361.16 (1.10 - 1.23)Moderate
CKD is associated with increased odds of receipt of CABG vs. PCI amongst people revascularized following STEMI.6939,1591.54 (1.23 - 1.93)Moderate
CKD is associated with increased odds of receipt of CABG vs. PCI amongst people revascularized following ACS in people who do not receive dialysis.51,020,7731.44 (1.20 - 1.71)Low
CKD is associated with increased odds of receipt of CABG vs. PCI amongst people revascularized following ACS in people who receive dialysis.5838,9351.25 (1.12 - 1.40)Moderate