Cardiology Research, ISSN 1923-2829 print, 1923-2837 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, Cardiol Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://cr.elmerpub.com

Original Article

Volume 16, Number 2, April 2025, pages 120-129


Computer-Assisted Electrocardiogram Analysis Improves Risk Assessment of Underlying Atrial Fibrillation in Cryptogenic Stroke

Figures

↓  Figure 1. Graphic example of some of the relevant ECG variables quantified by the Philips algorithm. ECG: electrocardiogram.
Figure 1.
↓  Figure 2. Flow diagram of the methods employed to obtain the final predictive model. CS: cryptogenic stroke; AF: atrial fibrillation; ECG: electrocardiogram.
Figure 2.

Tables

↓  Table 1. Clinical, Biochemical, Echocardiographic and Manually Assessed ECG Baseline Characteristics
 
All patients (n = 67)No AF (n = 46)AF (n = 21)P value
Quantitative variables are displayed as median (1Q; 3Q). BMI: body mass index; CAD: coronary artery disease; TNT: troponin T; NT-proBNP: N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide; LADV: left atrium diastolic volume; iLADV: indexed LADV; LASV: left atrium systolic volume; LASr: left atrial reservoir strain; LAEF: left atrial ejection fraction; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction (calculated by Simpson biplane method); RBBB: right bundle branch block; LBBB: left bundle branch block; TIA: transitory ischemic attack.
Age (years)80.0 (73.0; 84.0)78.5 (71.0; 82.8)83.0 (78.0; 86.0)0.010
BMI (kg/m2)25.7 (23.6; 28.0)25.9 (23.6; 28.5)24.8 (23.3; 26.8)0.154
Sex0.780
  Female35 (52.2%)23 (50.0%)12 (57.1%)
Hypertension39 (58.2%)22 (47.8%)17 (81.0%)0.022
Diabetes mellitus16 (23.9%)11 (23.9%)5 (23.8%)1.000
Dyslipidemia39 (58.2%)28 (60.9%)11 (52.4%)0.699
Tobacco0.674
  Never51 (76.1%)34 (73.9%)17 (81.0%)
  Current7 (10.4%)6 (13.0%)1 (4.76%)
  Former9 (13.4%)6 (13.0%)3 (14.3%)
CAD10 (14.9%)6 (13.0%)4 (19.0%)0.713
TNT (ng/L)14.0 (10.1; 24.1)12.9 (9.87; 21.7)17.1 (12.0; 29.0)0.036
NT-proBNP (pg/mL)245 (113; 463)152 (66.0; 372)420 (305; 1704)< 0.001
LADV (mL)51.0 (39.0; 68.2)47.8 (36.8; 55.8)65.0 (47.0; 77.0)0.014
iLADV (mL/m2)29.5 (22.8; 40.0)27.5 (21.2; 33.8)37.8 (27.7; 42.0)0.014
LASV (mL)25.0 (18.0; 37.0)20.9 (16.2; 29.8)33.0 (22.0; 38.0)0.020
LASr (%)27.1 (18.5; 34.1)31.1 (26.9; 37.6)16.9 (13.9; 21.8)< 0.001
LAEF (%)51.6 (37.2; 59.7)52.6 (38.5; 64.0)45.9 (37.0; 53.3)0.105
Septal thickness (mm)11.0 (10.0; 12.0)11.0 (10.0; 12.0)11.0 (10.0; 12.0)0.606
LVEF (%)63.0 (59.5; 73.0)63.0 (59.0; 68.6)66.0 (60.0; 75.0)0.276
LVEDV (mL)66.0 (51.0; 86.0)69.5 (54.0; 87.0)61.0 (46.0; 70.0)0.229
LVESV (mL)20.0 (15.5; 31.0)22.5 (16.0; 33.0)19.0 (15.0; 26.0)0.433
Interatrial block0.42
  Type 14 (5.97%)2 (4.35%)2 (9.52%)
  Type 26 (8.95%)5 (10.9%)1 (4.76%)
PR (ms)177 (160; 190)172 (160; 190)180 (160; 190)0.533
QRS morphology0.258
  RBBB4 (5.97%)2 (4.35%)2 (9.52%)
  LBBB5 (7.46%)5 (10.9%)0 (0.00%)
QRS (ms)100 (90.0; 110)100 (90.0; 110)98.0 (95.0; 110)0.635
QTc (ms)442 (430; 455)440 (429; 457)445 (440; 450)0.583
TIA17 (25.4%)13 (28.3%)4 (19.0%)0.616

 

↓  Table 2. Predictive Model Including Clinical, Echocardiographic and Biochemical Variables
 
Variable (range)ORCI (2.5% - 97.5%)P value
OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; NT-proBNP: N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide; LASr: left atrial reservoir strain.
Age (> 76 years)4.690.59 - 51.500.163
NT-proBNP (> 203.5 pg/mL)8.211.56 - 58.550.020
LASr (≤ 23.3%)36.077.26 - 301.83< 0.001

 

↓  Table 3. Final Predictive Model Including Clinical, Echocardiographic Biochemical and ECG Variables
 
Variable (range)ORCI (2.5% - 97.5%)P value
ECG: electrocardiogram; NT-proBNP: N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide; LASr: left atrial reservoir strain; V1_ramp: amplitude of the R wave in lead V1.
Age (> 76 years)12.510.47 - 845.030.17
NT-proBNP (> 203.5 pg/mL)23.612.65 - 665.990.016
LASr (≤ 23.3%)145.9113.94 - 6,223.62< 0.001
V1_ramp (> 137 µV)33.043.38 - 1,167.860.013