Cardiology Research, ISSN 1923-2829 print, 1923-2837 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, Cardiol Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://cr.elmerpub.com

Original Article

Volume 16, Number 2, April 2025, pages 120-129


Computer-Assisted Electrocardiogram Analysis Improves Risk Assessment of Underlying Atrial Fibrillation in Cryptogenic Stroke

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Graphic example of some of the relevant ECG variables quantified by the Philips algorithm. ECG: electrocardiogram.
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Flow diagram of the methods employed to obtain the final predictive model. CS: cryptogenic stroke; AF: atrial fibrillation; ECG: electrocardiogram.

Tables

Table 1. Clinical, Biochemical, Echocardiographic and Manually Assessed ECG Baseline Characteristics
 
All patients (n = 67)No AF (n = 46)AF (n = 21)P value
Quantitative variables are displayed as median (1Q; 3Q). BMI: body mass index; CAD: coronary artery disease; TNT: troponin T; NT-proBNP: N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide; LADV: left atrium diastolic volume; iLADV: indexed LADV; LASV: left atrium systolic volume; LASr: left atrial reservoir strain; LAEF: left atrial ejection fraction; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction (calculated by Simpson biplane method); RBBB: right bundle branch block; LBBB: left bundle branch block; TIA: transitory ischemic attack.
Age (years)80.0 (73.0; 84.0)78.5 (71.0; 82.8)83.0 (78.0; 86.0)0.010
BMI (kg/m2)25.7 (23.6; 28.0)25.9 (23.6; 28.5)24.8 (23.3; 26.8)0.154
Sex0.780
  Female35 (52.2%)23 (50.0%)12 (57.1%)
Hypertension39 (58.2%)22 (47.8%)17 (81.0%)0.022
Diabetes mellitus16 (23.9%)11 (23.9%)5 (23.8%)1.000
Dyslipidemia39 (58.2%)28 (60.9%)11 (52.4%)0.699
Tobacco0.674
  Never51 (76.1%)34 (73.9%)17 (81.0%)
  Current7 (10.4%)6 (13.0%)1 (4.76%)
  Former9 (13.4%)6 (13.0%)3 (14.3%)
CAD10 (14.9%)6 (13.0%)4 (19.0%)0.713
TNT (ng/L)14.0 (10.1; 24.1)12.9 (9.87; 21.7)17.1 (12.0; 29.0)0.036
NT-proBNP (pg/mL)245 (113; 463)152 (66.0; 372)420 (305; 1704)< 0.001
LADV (mL)51.0 (39.0; 68.2)47.8 (36.8; 55.8)65.0 (47.0; 77.0)0.014
iLADV (mL/m2)29.5 (22.8; 40.0)27.5 (21.2; 33.8)37.8 (27.7; 42.0)0.014
LASV (mL)25.0 (18.0; 37.0)20.9 (16.2; 29.8)33.0 (22.0; 38.0)0.020
LASr (%)27.1 (18.5; 34.1)31.1 (26.9; 37.6)16.9 (13.9; 21.8)< 0.001
LAEF (%)51.6 (37.2; 59.7)52.6 (38.5; 64.0)45.9 (37.0; 53.3)0.105
Septal thickness (mm)11.0 (10.0; 12.0)11.0 (10.0; 12.0)11.0 (10.0; 12.0)0.606
LVEF (%)63.0 (59.5; 73.0)63.0 (59.0; 68.6)66.0 (60.0; 75.0)0.276
LVEDV (mL)66.0 (51.0; 86.0)69.5 (54.0; 87.0)61.0 (46.0; 70.0)0.229
LVESV (mL)20.0 (15.5; 31.0)22.5 (16.0; 33.0)19.0 (15.0; 26.0)0.433
Interatrial block0.42
  Type 14 (5.97%)2 (4.35%)2 (9.52%)
  Type 26 (8.95%)5 (10.9%)1 (4.76%)
PR (ms)177 (160; 190)172 (160; 190)180 (160; 190)0.533
QRS morphology0.258
  RBBB4 (5.97%)2 (4.35%)2 (9.52%)
  LBBB5 (7.46%)5 (10.9%)0 (0.00%)
QRS (ms)100 (90.0; 110)100 (90.0; 110)98.0 (95.0; 110)0.635
QTc (ms)442 (430; 455)440 (429; 457)445 (440; 450)0.583
TIA17 (25.4%)13 (28.3%)4 (19.0%)0.616

 

Table 2. Predictive Model Including Clinical, Echocardiographic and Biochemical Variables
 
Variable (range)ORCI (2.5% - 97.5%)P value
OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; NT-proBNP: N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide; LASr: left atrial reservoir strain.
Age (> 76 years)4.690.59 - 51.500.163
NT-proBNP (> 203.5 pg/mL)8.211.56 - 58.550.020
LASr (≤ 23.3%)36.077.26 - 301.83< 0.001

 

Table 3. Final Predictive Model Including Clinical, Echocardiographic Biochemical and ECG Variables
 
Variable (range)ORCI (2.5% - 97.5%)P value
ECG: electrocardiogram; NT-proBNP: N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide; LASr: left atrial reservoir strain; V1_ramp: amplitude of the R wave in lead V1.
Age (> 76 years)12.510.47 - 845.030.17
NT-proBNP (> 203.5 pg/mL)23.612.65 - 665.990.016
LASr (≤ 23.3%)145.9113.94 - 6,223.62< 0.001
V1_ramp (> 137 µV)33.043.38 - 1,167.860.013