Cardiology Research, ISSN 1923-2829 print, 1923-2837 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, Cardiol Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://cr.elmerpub.com

Original Article

Volume 16, Number 4, August 2025, pages 312-320


Increase in Aortic Valve Mean Gradients One Day After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: The Role of Mitral Regurgitation

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Change in transvalvular mean gradient across time for patients with no-to-mild MR and patients with moderate-to-severe MR. MR: mitral regurgitation; TAVI: transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Change in transvalvular max gradient across time for patients with no-to-mild MR and patients with moderate-to-severe MR. MR: mitral regurgitation; TAVI: transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Tables

Table 1. Comparing Baseline Clinical Characteristics Between Patients With No-to-Mild MR and Patients With Moderate-to-Severe MR
 
Baseline clinical characteristics of the patientsNo-to-mild MR (n = 327)Moderate-to-severe MR (n = 51)P value
Data are expressed as median (IQR, 25th - 75th percentile) or proportion (percentages). P < 0.05 indicates the difference between the two groups is statistically significant. BMI: body mass index; CABG: coronary artery bypass grafting; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; MR: mitral regurgitation; NYHA: New York Heart Association; TAVI: transcatheter aortic valve implantation; TIA: transient ischemic attack; IQR: interquartile range.
Age (years)77 (71 - 84)79 (76 - 85)0.01
Gender (male)177 (54.1%)29 (56.9%)0.01
Clinical history
  Diabetes mellitus160 (48.9%)22 (43.1%)0.44
  Hypertension292 (89.3%)48 (94.1%)0.29
  Hyperlipidemia270 (82.6%)40 (78.4%)0.47
  Peripheral vascular disease102 (31.2%)15 (29.4%)0.80
  Stroke/TIA54 (16.5%)14 (27.5%)0.06
  COPD72 (22%)10 (19.6%)0.70
  Atrial fibrillation102 (31.2%)23 (45.1%)0.05
  Previous permanent pacemaker38 (11.6%)10 (19.6%)0.11
  Chronic kidney disease155 (47.4%)33 (64.7%)0.02
  Coronary artery disease210 (64.2%)35 (68.6%)0.54
  Previous myocardial infarction72 (22%)8 (15.7%)0.30
  Previous CABG64 (19.6%)20 (39.2%)0.002
  Obstructive sleep apnea70 (21.4%)7 (13.7%)0.21
BMI (kg/m2)29 (25 - 34.7)26.37 (23.96 - 30)0.002
NYHA class III-IV symptoms309 (94.8%)48 (94.1%)0.96
CHA2DS2-VASc score4 (4 - 5)5 (4 - 6)0.002
Type of TAVI valve
  SAPIEN34 (10.4%)9 (17.6%)0.19
  SAPIEN XT3 (0.9%)2 (3.9%)0.19
  SAPIEN 3286 (87.5%)40 (78.5%)0.19
  SAPIEN 3 Ultra4 (1.2%)00.19

 

Table 2. Comparing Various Factors Considered to Be Low-Flow State Inducers Between Patients With No-to-Mild MR and Patients With Moderate-to-Severe MR
 
Low-flow state factorsNo-to-mild MR (n = 327)Moderate-to-severe MR (n = 51)P value
Data are expressed as median (IQR, 25th - 75th percentile) or proportion (percentages). P < 0.05 indicates the difference between the two groups is statistically significant. MR: mitral regurgitation; TAVI: transcatheter aortic valve implantation; IQR: interquartile range.
Volume status
  Pre-TAVI weight (kg)83.9 (71 - 99.2)75.7 (65.8 - 88.3)0.005
  Post-TAVI weight (kg)84.1 (70.48 - 100)76.2 (65 - 90)0.006
  Pre-TAVI systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)155 (139 - 173)146 (129 - 163.5)0.055
  Pre-TAVI diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg)67 (59 - 76.5)64 (55 - 74.5)0.175
  Immediate post-TAVI systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)126 (114 - 141.5)130 (118.5 - 139}0.62
  Immediate post-TAVI diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg)54 (47 - 62.5)54 (46 - 63.5)0.813
  24-h post-TAVI systolic blood pressure (mm Hg))127 (115 - 138)124 (118 - 139)0.664
  24-h post-TAVI diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg))57 (50 - 65)56 (46 - 64.5)0.451
  Peri-procedural fluids (mL)575 (200 - 800)550 (125.5 - 950)0.411
  Post-procedural fluids (mL)394 (0 - 970)450 (0 - 1,050)0.869
Medications
  Total fentanyl dose (mg)100 (50 - 250)100 (50 - 250)0.733
  Total propofol dose (g)000.945
  Total versed dose (g)1 (0 - 2)1 (0 - 2)0.587
  Total dexmedetomidine dose (µg)16.8 (0 - 83.35)26.5 (0 - 63.45)0.669

 

Table 3. Comparing Echocardiographic Characteristics Between Patients With No-to-Mild MR and Patients With Moderate-to-Severe MR
 
Echocardiographic characteristics of the patientsNo-to-mild MR (n = 327)Moderate-to-severe MR (n = 51)P value
Data are expressed as median (IQR, 25th - 75th percentile) or proportion (percentages). P < 0.05 indicates the difference between the two groups is statistically significant. MR: mitral regurgitation; TAVI: transcatheter aortic valve implantation; IQR: interquartile range.
Pre-TAVI
  Left ventricular ejection fraction (%)58 (55 - 62.5)51 (45 - 57.1)< 0.001
  Aortic valve area (cm2)0.78 (0.66 - 0.90)0.77 (0.69 - 0.85)0.002
  Aortic valve mean gradient (mm Hg)41.1 (32.9 - 48.11)34.5 (24.3 - 45)0.017
Immediate post-TAVI
  Transvalvular mean gradient (mm Hg)4.5 (3 - 6)3.3 (2.5 - 4.7)< 0.001
  Transvalvular peak gradient (mm Hg)9.4 (7 - 13)7 (5.9 - 10)< 0.001
24-h post-TAVI
  Transvalvular mean gradient (mm Hg)11 (8 - 14.7)9.05 (7 - 13)< 0.001
  Transvalvular peak gradient (mm Hg)22 (16.3 - 29.1)18 (13.4 - 24.3)< 0.001
Deltas (24-h - immediate)
  Transvalvular mean gradient delta (mm Hg)6 (3.7 - 9)6 (3.4 - 9)0.87
  Transvalvular peak gradient delta (mm Hg)12.2 (6.8 - 18)12 (5.5 - 15.9)0.41

 

Table 4. Quantitative Echocardiographic Measurements of MR Before and After TAVI, Stratified by MR Severity Groups
 
MR severity quantification by TTEPre-TAVIPost-TAVIP value
Quantitative metrics include MR vena contracta, EROA measured by both PISA and continuity methods, and regurgitant volume. In the no-to-mild MR group, quantitative values are uniformly reported below ASE guideline-based thresholds for moderate MR due to the absence of sufficiently measurable MR jets, a limitation inherent to the minimal severity in this cohort. As such, statistical comparisons are not applicable for this group. In contrast, patients with moderate-to-severe MR demonstrated significant reductions in all quantitative parameters post-TAVI. Data are expressed as median (IQR, 25th - 75th percentile) or proportion (percentages). P < 0.05 indicates the difference between the two groups is statistically significant. EROA: effective regurgitant orifice area; TTE: transthoracic echocardiogram; MR: mitral regurgitation; PISA: proximal isovelocity surface area; TAVI: transcatheter aortic valve implantation; ASE: American Society of Echocardiography; IQR: interquartile range.
No-to-mild MR patients (n = 327)
  MR vena contracta (cm)< 0.30< 0.30-
  MR EROA - PISA (cm2)< 0.20< 0.20-
  MR EROA - continuity (cm2)< 0.20< 0.20-
  Regurgitant volumes (mL)< 30< 30-
Moderate-to-severe MR patients (n = 51)
  MR vena contracta (cm)0.50 (0.41 - 0.71)0.3 (0.30 - 0.30)< 0.001
  MR EROA - PISA (cm2)0.40 (0.34 - 0.57)0.20 (0.20 - 0.20)< 0.001
  MR EROA - continuity (cm2)0.41 (0.35 - 0.61)0.20 (0.20 - 0.20)< 0.001
  Regurgitant volumes (mL)73.94 (58.26 - 114.61)30 (30 - 30)< 0.001