Cardiology Research, ISSN 1923-2829 print, 1923-2837 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, Cardiol Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://cr.elmerpub.com

Original Article

Volume 16, Number 4, August 2025, pages 373-379


Impact of Post-Procedural Atrial Arrhythmia on Long-Term Cardiac Function and Quality of Life Following Patent Foramen Ovale Closure

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1. PFO closure procedure. Intraoperative image demonstrating transcatheter deployment of a double-disc occluder device across the atrial septum.
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Comparison of SF-36 quality of life sub-domain scores between post-intervention and long-term follow-up periods in patients undergoing PFO closure. Radar chart displays eight sub-domains of the SF-36 questionnaire: overall health, physical health, physical function, emotional function, social function, physical pain, energy, and mental health. The purple line represents scores at long-term follow-up, while the navy line represents scores at the post-interventional period. Social function improved significantly at long-term follow-up (P < 0.05), highlighted by an asterisk. The inner and outer octagonal frames correspond to 60% and 90% of the maximum score range, respectively, providing a visual reference for relative domain performance. Source data are provided here (Supplementary Material 1, cr.elmerpub.com).

Tables

Table 1. Clinical Characteristics of Study Participants (N = 215)
 
VariablesResults
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or number (percentage), as appropriate. BMI: body mass index; ASA: atrial septal aneurysm; AA: atrial arrhythmia; NYHA, New York Heart Association.
Age (years)59 ± 12.3
Male gender, n (%)110 (51.2%)
BMI, kg/m225 ± 3.6
Smoking, n (%)95 (44.2%)
Alcohol, n (%)138 (64.2%)
Hypertension, n (%)97 (45.1%)
Coronary artery disease, n (%)73 (34.0%)
Diabetes mellitus, n (%)24 (11.2%)
Stroke, n (%)160 (74.4%)
Sinus rhythm preoperative, n (%)215 (100.0%)
AA after PFO closure, n (%)56 (26.0%)
  Atrial fibrillation, n (%)47 (21.9%)
  Atrial flutter, n (%)6 (2.8%)
  Atrial premature beats, n (%)52 (24.2%)
  Atrial tachycardia, n (%)38 (17.7%)
NYHA functional class2 ± 0.6
Spontaneous shunt, n (%)32 (14.9%)
ASA, n (%)11 (5.1%)
Follow-up, months24 ± 7.8

 

Table 2. Echocardiographic Parameters Following PFO Closure in Patients With Atrial Arrhythmia (N = 56)
 
Post-interventionLong-term follow-upP value
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). *P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. PFO: patent foramen ovale; LA: left atrial anteroposterior diameter; LVEDV: left ventricular end-diastolic volume; LVESV: left ventricular end-systolic volume; IVS: interventricular septal thickness; LVPW: left ventricular posterior wall thickness; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; PAPs: pulmonary artery systolic pressure; ASA: atrial septal aneurysm.
LA (mm)39.75 ± 4.4839.05 ± 3.900.382
LVEDV (mL/m2)53.25 ± 5.0552.71 ± 4.450.553
LVESV (mL/m2)21.16 ± 3.1221.55 ± 2.540.466
IVS (mm)7.68 ± 0.967.73 ± 0.880.759
LVPW (mm)7.82 ± 0.967.88 ± 0.920.763
LVEF (%)60.61 ± 4.3761.05 ± 4.030.576
Mitral (E/A)1.20 ± 0.241.29 ± 0.180.025*
PAPs (mm Hg)21.41 ± 1.9121.84 ± 1.870.232
ASA, n (%)3 (5.3%)2 (3.6%)0.647