Cardiology Research, ISSN 1923-2829 print, 1923-2837 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, Cardiol Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://cr.elmerpub.com

Original Article

Volume 17, Number 6, December 2026, pages 630-641


Association Between Changes in Paravalvular Leakage After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Serum Lactate Dehydrogenase

Figures

↓  Figure 1. Study flow chart. PVL: paravalvular leakage; TAVI: transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Figure 1.
↓  Figure 2. Changes in LDH levels before TAVI and 1 day, 3 days, 7 days, and 1 month after TAVI. LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; PVL: paravalvular leakage; TAVI: transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Figure 2.
↓  Figure 3. Severity of serum LDH elevation. LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; PVL: paravalvular leakage; TAVI: transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Figure 3.
↓  Figure 4. Changes in PVL severity after TAVI. PVL: paravalvular leakage; TAVI: transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Figure 4.
↓  Figure 5. ROC curve for predicting paravalvular leakage deterioration using the sizing index. The area under the ROC curve was 0.84, with an optimal cut-off value of 96.5% (odds ratio: 13.6; 95% confidence interval: 6.55–31.1; P < 0.01). ROC: receiver operating characteristic.
Figure 5.

Tables

↓  Table 1. Baseline Patient Characteristics
 
OverallPVL deterioration groupNon-PVL deterioration groupP value
Values are mean ± standard deviation or n (%), unless otherwise specified. AR: aortic regurgitation; BSA: body surface area; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; LCC: left-coronary cusp; LVOT: left ventricular outflow tract; MR: mitral valve regurgitation; NCC: non-coronary cusp; NYHA: New York Heart Association classification; PVL: paravalvular leakage; RCC: right-coronary cusp.
Number of patients31351262
  Age, years84.3 ± 5.084.2 ± 5.384.4 ± 4.90.81
    Age ≥ 85 years151 (48.2)23 (45.1)128 (48.9)0.62
  Men130 (41.5)20 (39.2)110 (42.0)0.71
  BSA, m21.53 ± 0.181.55 ± 0.181.52 ± 0.180.39
  NYHA-0.08
    I/II242 (77.3)44 (86.3)198 (75.6)
    III/IV71 (22.7)7 (13.7)64 (24.3)
Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score7.4 ± 5.57.0 ± 4.37.4 ± 5.70.59
  Hypertension254 (81.2)47 (92.2)207 (79.0)0.02
  Diabetes mellitus87 (27.8)16 (31.4)71 (27.1)0.54
  Dyslipidemia122 (39.0)21 (41.2)101 (38.6)0.73
  Heart failure hospitalization153 (48.9)24 (47.1)129 (49.2)0.78
  Echocardiographic parameters
    LVEF, %58.8 ± 12.561.0 ± 11.358.4 ± 12.70.18
    Mean aortic gradient, mm Hg45.8 ± 13.045.9 ± 14.245.8 ± 12.80.95
    Aortic valve area, cm20.74 ± 0.220.77 ± 0.170.73 ± 0.230.31
    AR ≥ mild177 (56.6)36 (70.6)141 (53.8)0.02
    AR ≥ moderate41 (13.1)7 (13.7)34 (13.0)0.89
    MR ≥ moderate61 (19.5)6 (11.8)55 (21.0)0.11
  Computed tomography parameters
    Annulus area, mm2452 ± 82453 ± 78451 ± 820.88
    Annulus perimeter, mm75.6 ± 6.974.1 ± 6.475.9 ± 7.00.09
    LVOT calc ≥ moderate17 (5.4)6 (11.8)11 (4.2)0.048
  Calcium score1,480 ± 3081,769 ± 3601,425 ± 263< 0.01
    LCC calcium score451 ± 107505 ± 127404 ± 95< 0.01
    NCC calcium score605 ± 121707 ± 147585 ± 105< 0.01
    RCC calcium score455 ± 120557 ± 147435 ± 103< 0.01
    Bicuspid valve17 (5.4)6 (11.8)11 (4.2)0.048

 

↓  Table 2. Procedural Outcomes
 
OverallPVL deterioration groupNon-PVL deterioration groupP value
Values are mean ± SD or the median (IQR: 25th–75th percentile), or n (%), unless otherwise specified. EOA: effective orifice area; PPM: prosthesis–patient mismatch; PVL: paravalvular leakage; SD: standard deviation; IQR: interquartile range.
Number of patients31351262
  Fluoroscopy time, min17.9 ± 7.516.8 ± 6.018.1 ± 7.70.25
  General anesthesia251 (80.2)45 (88.2)206 (78.6)0.1
  Anesthesia time, min118 ± 50107 ± 31120 ± 530.09
  Contrast volume, mL39 ± 2035 ± 2040 ± 200.12
  Blood transfusion17 (5.4)3 (5.9)14 (5.3)0.87
  Transfemoral270 (86.3)48 (94.1)222 (84.7)0.052
Valve< 0.01
  SAPIEN 3233 (74.4)24 (47.1)209 (79.8)
  SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA80 (25.6)27 (52.9)53 (20.2)
  Valve size< 0.01
    20 mm16 (5.1)3 (5.9)13 (5.0)
    23 mm170 (54.3)34 (66.7)136 (51.9)
    26 mm103 (32.9)11 (21.6)92 (35.1)
    29 mm24 (7.7)3 (5.9)21 (8.0)
  Under volume204 (65.2)36 (70.6)168 (64.1)0.37
  Sizing index97.8 ± 5.593.2 ± 3.998.6 ± 5.4< 0.01
  Balloon pre-dilation155 (49.4)19 (37.3)136 (51.7)0.06
  Balloon post-dilation30 (9.6)1 (2.0)29 (11.1)0.02
  Conversion to open heart surgery0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
  Vascular complications
    Minor1 (0.3)0 (0)1 (0.4)0.55
    Major11 (3.5)2 (3.9)9 (3.4)0.86
  Pacemaker implantation9 (3.0)1 (2.2)8 (3.2)0.7
Hemodynamic support needed0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
  Paravalvular leakage
    ≥ mild43 (13.7)2 (3.9)41 (15.7)0.01
    ≥ moderate2 (0.6)0 (0)2 (0.8)0.4
Postprocedural mean aortic gradient, mm Hg11.3 ± 3.810.9 ± 3.911.4 ± 3.80.37
  Length of hospital stay, days7.8 (6.7–8.9)7.6 (6.5–8.4)7.9 (6.8–9.2)0.67
  EOA, cm21.92 ± 0.561.94 ± 0.611.92 ± 0.550.88
  Indexed EOA, cm2/m21.27 ± 0.361.26 ± 0.391.27 ± 0.350.84
  PPM
    ≥ moderate20 (6.4)4 (7.8)16 (6.1)0.65
    ≥ severe1 (0.3)1 (2.0)0 (0)0.55
Clinically relevant hemolysis2 (0.6)2 (3.9)0 (0)< 0.01

 

↓  Table 3. Predictors of PVL Deterioration in Univariable and Multivariable Logistic Regression Analyses
 
Univariate analysisMultivariate analysis
OR (95% CI)P valueOR (95% CI)P value
Values are mean ± standard deviation or n (%), unless otherwise specified. AR: aortic valve regurgitation; CI: confidence interval; LVOT: left ventricular outflow tract; OR: odds ratio; PVL: paravalvular leakage.
AR ≥ mild2.04 (1.09–4.02)0.031.82 (0.81–4.07)0.15
LVOT calcium ≥ moderate3.05 (1.01–8.46)0.0482.48 (0.59–10.4)0.21
Aortic valve calcium score ≥ 1,435 (median)8.29 (3.82–20.8)< 0.016.54 (2.62–16.3)< 0.01
SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA4.44 (2.37–8.36)< 0.012.67 (1.19–6.01)0.01
Post-dilatation0.16 (0.01–0.78)0.020.41 (0.04–3.95)0.44
Sizing index < 96.513.6 (6.55–31.1)< 0.0110.5 (4.45–24.6)< 0.01
Bicuspid valve3.04 (1.08–8.55)0.035